Qmp

[edwinz]

Superb player, it can play the main types of music files (mp3, wma, ogg, etc). The skin gives me a fresh feeling, there are much more functions than Window Media Player, and it is better than iTunes somehow. This is much better than the previous QCD players. However, this is still a new player and can have a lot of improvements. The only things that are not so good will be it consume quite a large amount of memory usage (well, it's still better than iTunes and WMP, but it's far worse than foobar); the playlist is like the one in Winamp; things are not very organized (I will prefer foobar in terms of organizing music files). Anyway, this is a very ambitious try and I ll always support Quinnware players.

[Tokelil]

The only things that are not so good will be it consume quite a large amount of memory usage (well, it's still better than iTunes and WMP, but it's far worse than foobar);An unfortunate effect of skinning... :ermm:

[teedoff087]

Just curious, how much RAM is it using normally?

[edwinz]

Just curious, how much RAM is it using normally?


very unstable, on my computer: from 3000K to 17000K
Window Media Player: 7000-13000
iTunes: more than 15000
Foolbar: less than 5000

[Willow of Oz]

Hi Edwinz!
Welcome to the forums.

[edwinz]

Hi Edwinz!
Welcome to the forums.

hiya, my first time in a forum in my life :cheerful:
I like the Rip&Encode and the EQ functions in the new player, awesome!

[B.E.L.B.H.D.]

Awesome is the word alright. Also, it may be better than iTunes simply because it is not made by Apple.

[t22design]

*cough* Knob *cough*

[hedge]

hah gotta love random flamers... specially guys like this hehe

[Heigar]

I see we have another idiot in the forum!

[Toe]

So far for me, QMP seems to use 10-20MB RAM most of the time, but it can vary anywhere from 7MB to 30MB.

[Shadowraven]

I see we have another idiot in the forum!
Nah, I wouldn't give him that much credit. Trolls aren't usually that intelligent. Maybe a low-grade moron would be more accurate. "plonk!"